Golf365 Opinion: The Ryder Cup Wildcards
By this time next week we will know the identity of Thomas Bjorn’s four wildcard selections, thus completing his team for the Ryder Cup at Le Golf National and with the announcement will come the cry that is increasingly narrowing, rather than increasing, sporting debate.
It is a familiar cry in the Ryder Cup, one that will come again soon after the first foursomes combinations are revealed, will be repeated when they are completed and shall echo for every series of matches throughout the week.
Not that the howl is unique to the bi-annual event. In fact it is as common in the world of sport as ripped up betting slips, but social media has enabled a subtle, and damaging, shift in tone (a pity because, at least in theory, it has the potential to do the opposite).
The cry should be a simple question: Why? As in: “Why did he pick Golfer A instead of Golfer B?” Or: “Why did he partner Golfer X and Golfer Y in foursomes and not fourballs?”
Instead we get: “WHY?!?!?!?!?!” And this alternative is not an inquiry but a statement of derision and a demand to be heard, often followed by a comically wounded declaration of “What I would have done”.
Which is not to say that debate and argument should not take place. That’s clearly nonsense. Why do we love sport? One reason is that we like haggling over ideas, proposing alternatives and cosily imagining everything would have been different if we were captain or manager (funnily enough, nothing ever goes wrong within our alternate universe).
We’ve always thrived on this idle love of pretending we were in charge. What we’ve lost is the capacity to maintain a sense of perspective: to remember that all the conjecture really is only pretend therefore our opinion, however much we cling to it, doesn’t actually matter.
Consider this. When Bjorn makes his four picks what we really need to know is why he made them.
Of course, he’ll want to avoid hurting anyone’s feelings and inadvertently revealing valuable secrets, but you can be sure that he will have had access to all manner of evidence, from statistical studies to insider knowledge, all of which grants him far more insight that any of us are ever going to have. So if, next week, he doesn’t pick a player many would have pencilled in I’d like, first and foremost, to know why. What grain of information was more persuasive than conventional wisdom? What I don’t particularly want is lots of people with limited insight shouting what they’d have done instead (not, at least, without a degree of self-awareness).
And why does it matter that we take time to consider and think, rather than holler and scream? Because doing the latter is just noise and doesn’t get us anywhere. Announcing that “everyone knows that combination was never going to work” overlooks the fact that the captain thought it might. I’d like to know why and he’s not going to be in the mood to explain if everyone is going berserk.
To give a non-golfing example, shouting that a right-back has played poorly means little unless you’re aware of his instructions from the manager. For all we know he fulfilled his brief. Maybe the reason he never made an overlap is that the manager told him not to, demanding that he concentrate on his defensive duties. If, instead of screaming “WHY?!?!?!!?” someone quietly and without implication asked “Why?” we might get interesting answers from sportsmen and women. You never know, we might gain insight and find ourselves in a position to genuinely judge performance.
Far easier, however, to scream “WHY?!?!?!?!?”, an explosion of absolute confidence and fury that doesn’t really care for answers. It’s possibly a consequence of having become utterly besotted with ourselves. Whatever it is, the notion that we’re only ever guessing has become a reality we absolutely refuse to accept.
Of course, Bjorn himself is only guessing. The difference is that he’s doing it with more background data and his guessing will be judged by the final result. Terry from The Nag’s Head? Sally on Twitter? Geoff voxpopped on Sky News? Matt at Golf365? None of our guesses will ever be dropped into a sporting test tube. Untested and inevitably undefeated. Lucky us.
There is a further element to this business of the wildcards. Bjorn might pick someone and get flak for it, but once a captain is selected it’s surely up to him who he picks? He needs full confidence in his options. If he’s unsure about Player Z (for whatever reason) yet picks him because he’s the popular choice that’s not good leadership, it’s actually very, very, very, very bad captaincy.
So who would I pick? For what’s worth (nothing): Ian Poulter, Rafa Cabrera Bello, Sergio Garcia and Henrik Stenson (Thomas Pieters if Stenson is unfit).
But should Bjorn select Jan Molby, Hans Christian Andersen, Lars Ulrich and Soren Kierkegaard, as long as he can explain why, that’s fine by me. Held og lykke, Thomas.
Romain Langasque equals course record to lead Alfred Dunhill Links Championship
The Frenchman recovered from an early bogey with two eagles and eight birdies to reach 11 under par.
Rory McIlroy bemoans ‘ugly year’ and seeks solution to divide in golf world
The arrival of Saudi-backed LIV Golf series has fractured the game in 2022.
On this day in 2014 – Europe retain Ryder Cup with Gleneagles victory
The Gleneagles victory was Europe’s eighth win in 10 matches.
‘Is this where I am going to die?’ Nicolas Colsaerts on kidney disorder battle
The Belgian is the focus of attention this week as he belatedly defends the Cazoo Open de France title he won three years ago.
On this day in 2008: Ryder Cup misery in Louisville for Nick Faldo’s Europe team
Faldo was heavily criticised for his tactics in the closing singles.
Open champion Cameron Smith wins first LIV trophy in just second start
The world number two is the highest-ranked player to join the rebel series.
Robert MacIntyre beats Matt Fitzpatrick in play-off to win Italian Open
MacIntyre birdied the first extra hole at Marco Simone Golf and Country Club, the venue for next year’s Ryder Cup.
Matt Fitzpatrick holds narrow lead ahead of final round at Italian Open
Rory McIlroy and Aaron Rai are one shot off the pace.
Rory McIlroy picks up the pace to claim lead ahead of Matt Fitzpatrick in Rome
McIlroy’s group looked unlikely to complete their second rounds after taking three hours to play nine holes.
Matt Fitzpatrick leads way at Italian Open despite ‘inconsistent’ display
The US Open champion held a one-shot lead over fellow Englishman Tom Lewis,